top of page
corneraxon_png_white.png

The Right to Linger

thesis statement:

Privatization has shaped the character of urban space, often producing more formal and restrained social environments in the street, the building, and the thresholds between them. This thesis explores how expanding architectural thresholds into inhabitable, spatially layered zones can create new opportunities for interaction and public life. Through strategies such as graduated visibility, enclosure, and integrated dwelling infrastructure, extended thresholds can support a broader range of everyday encounters and strengthen connections between users.

Threshold Design as Resistance to Urban Privatization

+​ encounter + public realm activation + design as enablement + spaces as negotiation + street-level engagement + place-specificity + fourth places

on-going thesis progress as of December 2025

- Professor Rob Trumbour -  Fall 2025

- programs used: Rhino3D, Photoshop, Illustrator

U.S. cities public realm timeline

* 1960s zoning incentive for privately-owned public space (POPS)

0-2 ft thresholds

1012thresholdtimeline_edited_edited.jpg

spontaneous

interconnected

human-scale

lingering

porous

TRANSITIONAL

COLD

UNENGAGED

PLACELESS

PRIVATIZED

TENSE

adaptive

enabling

inhabitable

reactivated

inviting

pre-1850s

1920s-1960s

modernist movement

1980s-present

contemporary privatization

future

expanded thresholds revitalize the public realm

6-10 ft thresholds

8-20 ft thresholds

*

traditional threshold typologies

IMG_0604_edited_edited_edited_edited_edi

user autonomy: personal chair brought out

spectrum of interaction through different spatial levels

the stoop

Untitled_Artwork 2_edited_edited.jpg

shelter as a favorable condition

spectrum of inhabitation through varying levels of visibility

fixed seating invites lounging

arcaded plazas

POPS (privately-owned public space) Analysis - NYC

well-maintained

multi-functional

open 24/7

owner compliance

good lighting

inviting

spatially separate from street

trees and plantings

shelter provided

well-signed + easy to find

water feature

1019popscollage_edited_edited_edited.jpg

successful

enclosed

open

*

unsuccessful

fencing

hostile elements

blocked access points

closed often

unengaging

feels privatized

security interrupts use

insufficient lighting

hidden

lacking seating

poor maintenance

Greenacre (pocket) Park, NYC

example of a successful POPS

*

Untitled_Artwork 1 (1)_edited.jpg

water feature

graduated shelter

edge formalized

use of natural materials

level shift down towards fountain

level shift up from street

Untitled_Artwork (9)_edited.jpg

unfixed seating promotes user autonomy

greenery creates privacy

level change creates intimate space

formalized shelter through overhang

graduated visibility

design tactics for lingering

1018_allextendedthreshold.png
elongatedthresholddiagram.png

typical threshold

extended threshold

varying spatial levels, visibility, and enclosure

spectrum of inhabitation

site specific design

+

street

building

& the mandatory:
+signage
+comfortable microclimate

design tactics expanded - catalogue

designtactics2_png_edited.jpg

level changes

graduated shelter

graduated visibility

fixed seating

unfixed seating

formalized edge

local +natural materials

water feature

prospect + refuge

scope + boundaries - hypothetical site

typical scope

_WIT8853_edited.jpg

boundaries:
plot
sidewalk
facade

proposed site

_WIT8857_edited.jpg

boundaries:
plot
sidewalk

_WIT8868_edited.jpg

hard edge of facade softened

nook produced

varying visibility with different height difference

edge formalized with trees + overhang + level change

level change as separation from street

varying degrees of shelter with trees + overhang

site

Boston's West End

westendbeforeandafter_png_t.png

site

negative space between street and building

westend_2figureground.png

*

*

*

*

negative space typologies

cornertyp_png_edited.jpg
recessedtyp_png_edited_edited.jpg
linear_png_edited.jpg
anomaly_png_edited.jpg

typ 1 : corner threshold

typ 2 : recessed threshold

-pros: large open site, well located, local landmark, abundant existing greenery

-cons: exposed to street, current residential program

-pros: human scale, large area

-cons: tucked into quiet street, bordered by two unpleasant sites, current residential program

typ 3 : linear threshold

-pros: maximized edges, well located, current commercial program

-cons: bordered by tall buildings

typ 4 : anomaly

-pros: existing natural node, close to park

-cons: tucked into quiet street, bordered by tall buildings, current residential program

collagepng_w.png

typology 1: corner threshold

typ 1: design tests

scandesigntest.png

reclaim archway for public

nook created

edge formalized

abundant seating along proposed curve

interventioncollage1124_png.png

rework internal section of archway

maintain hierarchy of archway

create nooks with vegetation

edge formalized successfully creates separation from street

existing

intervened

typ 1: intervention in plan

interventionplan_png.png

rework internal section of archway

create nooks with vegetation

edge formalized successfully creates separation from street

design tactics that apply :

 

graduated visibility

formalized edge

fixed seating

unfixed seating

prospect + refuge

intervenedmodel2_edited.jpg
intervenedmodel1_edited.jpg

intervention in model

existing pedestrian experience

purely transitional

existingtext_png_white.png

proposed pedestrian experience

spectrum of inhabitation

proposedtext_png_w.png

"ideal" benches

bench4.png

test 1: abundant space for seating and gathering

bench3.png

test 2: using greenery for privacy

bench1.png

test 3: facilitates gathering in groups

image_edited.jpg

next steps:

mosaic design

- combats the coldness of privatization with detail, color, and craftsmanship

- rewarding proximity

- incentivize pausing, slowness, and lingering

riveirap@wit.edu

bottom of page